EPIC FAIL

     Chicago was eliminated in the first ballot of voting for the 2016 Olympics on Friday, a stunning defeat for President Obama who put his capital behind an enormous campaign.

Chicago had seemed to pick up momentum in the last few days, with many International Olympic Committee members seemingly charmed by Michelle Obama. But when IOC president Jacques Rogge announced the results of the first vote, Chicago’s name was announced.

Obama’s visit to Copenhagen was the first time a U.S. president made such an in-person appeal.

“I urge you to choose Chicago for the same reasons I chose Chicago nearly 25 years ago — the reasons I fell in love with the city I still call home,” Obama told members of the International Olympic Committee, many of whom he later mingled with as some snapped photos of him on their cell phones.

“And if you do — if we walk this path together — then I promise you this: The city of Chicago and the United States of America will make the world proud,” the president said.

Chicago, Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Tokyo have been making their cases to the IOC for more than a year, but many IOC members were believed to be undecided about which city they would vote for Friday.

By the time the winning bid is announced, the Obamas should be back on a plane to Washington.

The president’s whirlwind trip put him in the Danish capital for less than five hours Friday, with Chicago-backers hoping that would be sufficient to give Obama’s adopted home town the advantage it needed to win the close, four-way race to become the host city of the 2016 Summer Games.

But the compressed time frame did not shield Obama from Republican criticism that he shouldn’t be hopscotching to Europe in Air Force One when there were so many pressing issues to deal with at home.

Asked by a reporter how he thought his pitch went, Obama gave a thumbs up — and he said the video montage of Chicago during the U.S. presentation made him miss home.

“Obviously now it’s up to the IOC members, but we are just grateful for the incredible hospitality,” Obama said.

He joked that only one part upset him: “They arranged for me to follow Michelle — that’s always bad.”

Both Obamas spoke on deeply personal terms about Chicago, the city at the center of the world’s spotlight so many times, including in November when the former Illinois senator won the White House. The president described Chicago as a city of diversity and warmth, a place where he finally found a home.

“It’s a city that works, from its first World’s Fair more than a century ago to the World Cup we hosted in the nineties,” Obama said. “We know how to put on big events.”

For all the anticipation surrounding Obama’s appearance in Copenhagen, his arrival at the IOC meeting was decidedly subdued.

The 100-plus committee members, who had already been warned not show bias during the presentations, sat silently as the Obamas walked into the Bella Center with the rest of 12-member Chicago delegation.

Michelle Obama gave a passionate account of what the games would mean to her father, who taught her as a girl how to throw punches better than the boys. She spoke fondly of growing up on the South Side of Chicago, sitting on her father’s lap and cheering on Olympic athletes.

She noted that her late father had multiple sclerosis, so she knows something about athletes who compete against tough odds.

“Chicago’s vision for the Olympic and Paralympic movement is about so much more than what we can offer the games,” she said. “It’s about what the games can offer all of us — it’s about inspiring this generation and building a lasting legacy for the next.”

The president anchored the U.S. charm offensive.

He referenced his own election as a moment when people from around the world gathered in Chicago to see the results last November and celebrate that “our diversity could be a source of strength.”

“There is nothing I would like more than to step just a few blocks from my family’s home and with Michelle and our two girls welcome the world back to our neighborhood,” Obama said. “At the beginning of this new century, the nation that has been shaped by people from around the world wants a chance to inspire it once more.”

In advance of Obama’s arrival, Mrs. Obama did some high-powered lobbying for Chicago. The first lady has been in Copenhagen since Wednesday, holding one-on-one meetings with IOC members.

“I’m sure you’d all agree that she’s a pretty big selling point,” the president told his audience.

After the Obamas’ comments, the U.S. delegation fielded questions from committee members, and at one point the president jumped in to answer. He said he envisioned that the Chicago games would allow the United States to restore its image as a place that, at its best, is “open to the world.”

He emphasized that the White House and the State Department would put their full weight behind making sure international visitors “feel welcome and will come away with the sense of the incredible diversity of the American people.” And Americans, he said, will be reminded of their links to the rest of the world.

Though IOC President Jacques Rogge has said heads of state aren’t required to attend the IOC meeting, recent votes indicate their presence can make a difference.

During the 2005 IOC meeting in Singapore, then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair successfully lobbied members on behalf of London’s bid for the 2012 Summer Games. Two years later, Vladimir Putin, then president of Russia, helped secure the 2014 Winter Games for Sochi on Russia’s Black Sea coast.

Before leaving Copenhagen, the Obamas met briefly with Queen Margrethe II and Prince Consort Henrik.

The president wrapped the trip by visiting Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen. Obama noted his interest in the pivotal climate change summit in Copenhagen in December but did not answer questions about whether he would attend it.

Obama May Have To Force Healthcare On His Own.

     The fate of a government-run health insurance plan may rest in President Obama’s hands after the Senate Finance Committee rejected amendments that would include the so-called “public option” in its version of health care reform legislation. Liberal Democrats failed twice on Tuesday to include a government-run insurance option in the legislation before the committee, the last of five congressional panels completing work on the president’s top domestic priority. Once touted by Obama as essential in “keeping insurance companies honest,” the government plan was blasted by Senate Republicans and moderate Democrats, some of whom argued it would lead to a single-payer system. The vote to strike down two separate amendments underscored the disagreement among Democrats over the necessity of a public option.

     Whether Obama will continue to fight for it remains to be seen. The first amendment, proposed by Sen. John D. Rockefeller of West Virginia, was rejected 15 to 8. The second, penned by Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, was defeated 13 to 10. Rockefeller had proposed a plan modeled on Medicare, the federal health care program for senior citizens, in which the government would set what it pays doctors, hospitals and other medical providers. Schumer proposed a government plan that would look more like a private insurance company and negotiate payment rates with providers. Sen. John Ensign, D-NV, was quick to pounce on Rockefeller’s amendment, arguing that his idea for a public option would deny doctors participation in Medicare for two years if they choose not to participate in a new government program. Others, including Sen. Kent Conrad, D-ND, who has crafted an alternative plan that would set up a series of non-profit health care cooperatives, blasted Rockefeller’s plan, saying, “The devil is in the details.” He said if the amendment is implemented, “every major hospital goes broke.” The White House has been backtracking on its commitment to a public option. Obama made “universal health care” a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, but he later said a government-run program was not essential to reform. “The public option, whether we have it or we don’t have it, is not the entirety of health care reform,” the president said at a town hall meeting in Colorado on Aug. 15. “This is just one sliver of it, one aspect of it.”

      Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has said that the public option “is not the essential element” and has suggested that non-profit cooperatives would be a viable alternative. Supporters of a government-run plan have vowed to keep up their fight as the bill moves toward the Senate floor, and then to negotiations with the House. Democratic leaders in both chambers are pushing for floor votes in the fall. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a strong supporter of a government plan, said Tuesday there’s no rush on passing a House bill, especially since the legislation won’t take effect until 2013. “I believe we will have a public option in our bill,” Pelosi said during a briefing Tuesday with reporters. But senior Senate Democratic aides told FOX News that Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, will not include a public option in a health care reform bill he will create once the Finance Committee completes its action this week. After shooting down the two amendments, the committee will reconvene Wednesday to debate a number of other important issues in health care legislation, including thorny issues like abortion and insurance coverage for illegal immigrants.